The Liberal Patriot Bites the Dust

When I say I’m no longer a Democrat, a few people ask why. The reasons are so numerous that I quickly get flustered trying to summarize them coherently. Fortunately, there is someone out there who can speak for me. Unfortunately, as articulate as he is, his project, The Liberal Patriot is closing down for lack of support.

When Yascha Monk saw the news, he immediately set up an interview with Ruy Teixeira to talk about the loss of TLP. I’m offering a link to their discussion because it covers a lot of the issues I have with current Democrats. Teixeira is worried that if the Ds don’t alter their stance on some key issues, they won’t be able to build a lasting majority. He cites several culture war issues, ones that Trump used effectively in his campaign against Kamala Harris.

As it stands, the Democrats are the party of college educated elites who support DEI over merit, equality of outcome over equality of opportunity, trans rights over women’s rights, assume disparities prove discrimination (except in pro football and basketball), and think only white Europeans ever enslaved anyone (forgetting that only white Europeans decided to end slavery).

Listen, or read the transcript. Let me know if any of the concerns that Teixeira cites shake up your thinking about anything.

The Liberal Patriot Bites the Dust

Humpty Trumpty Sat on a Wall. Humpty Trumpty . . .

Of all the craziness emanating from the White House this year, the one thing that has truly surprised me is the executive orders relating to big law firms. Trump has stripped security clearances from several firms, restricted their access to federal buildings, and ordered that no federal agency can do business with them. All of this because these targeted firms have worked on behalf of Democrats or others who have challenged Trump’s actions. 

Surely this is illegal? Isn’t it? I guess we will find out. Some of the firms have buckled under the pressure and made deals, generally involving a lot of pro bono work for clients Trump cares about. Frankly, I’m shocked that any law firm would hesitate to sue Trump. But I guess that if competitive firms and circling your partners and employees like vultures checking to see if they can pick off some of your best and brightest, if your treasured clients are hesitant to do business with you in the Trump era, then the illegality may not be your top concern.

Or maybe this isn’t illegal. Surely, everyone deserves a lawyer if you find yourself in court, but perhaps you’re not entitled to very high priced lawyers. And, honestly, how could I feel sorry for the most expensive lawyers in the country? Actually, I don’t. It’s just that if Trump can target these big, pricy law firms and get away with it, then why would any lawyer defend clients on any issue that might offend Trump? 

Many of Trump’s actions have prompted legal challenges; some challenges have merited restraining orders; some are on appeal. But it will take a while (months? years?) before we get final words of wisdom. Meanwhile, we live in a waiting game, just as we do with tariffs. Yes, tariffs have been announced, but not all have gone into effect. For many items, the impact will only be felt when new shipments of whatever arrive on our shores. Again with the waiting game. 

Trump’s decisive actions have not led to immediate changes except with regard to layoffs of federal employees. The people losing their jobs will feel the effect immediately. But again, when research contracts are terminated, only those in the midst of clinical trials will feel anything. I can’t imagine being part of a clinical trial and having it terminated just because The Doge said so! The rest of us will never know which research was never completed. 

My question: Will the effects of Trump 2.0 be felt convincingly by 2026 and 2028 so that we can vote our way out of this chaos?