A World Without Israel?

The world has turned against Israel. This turn of events has led me to wonder what the world would be like without the state of Israel. I assume that many people standing on street corners with signs reading “Free Palestine” would like Israel to be wiped off the map. Yet I doubt that the majority of my neighbors envision that solution to the never ending debate over the Jewish state. In fact, I doubt that the majority of my neighbors think much of anything about Israel beyond their desire to be free of this particular conundrum. 

Still, I’d like to ponder the possibility that through some unknown sequence of events playing out over the next few years, Israel ceases to exist. Though this might not be the goal of many whose attitudes toward Israel have hardened recently, unintended consequences do occur. There are many ways this could happen. Jews could simply tire of never-ending conflict and take their chances elsewhere; Iran could send a nuclear bomb to Tel Aviv which would destroy the very small state; civil strife within Israel could devolve into civil war leading to mass exodus; Arab neighbors could succeed in defeating Israel’s armed forces. 

Ten million Israeli citizens live in a challenging neighborhood. Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, and the West Bank and Gaza hold a total of 166 million mostly Muslim neighbors who are not necessarily friendly despite peace treaties with Jordan and Egypt. These 166 million neighbors are just a fraction of the 2 billion Muslims worldwide. Muslims are not all jihadis seeking the end of Israel, but neither are they defenders of the lone Jewish state. Given these numbers, Western support for Israel could be vital to its continued existence. Hence my unease with the rising antagonism towards Israel, but also my curiosity about the necessity of a Jewish state. 

Let’s consider the Jewish diaspora. Many of the world’s 15 million Jews do not live in Israel. Recent data shows 7+ million, or 45% of Jews worldwide do live in Israel, 6+ million, or 40% live in the US, while the rest are dispersed around the western world in communities ranging from 400,000 down to as few as 10,000. If over 50% of Jews currently live outside of Israel, do Jews really need the Jewish state? 

If you have a globalist attitude, the answer might be simply that no state should explicitly exclude anyone outside their group and only give citizenship to their own people. If that’s your position, you win! There are currently no countries that meet that definition of an ethno state. There are three states that give preference to returning members of their diaspora for immigration and citizenship: Israel, Armenia, and Hungary, but all afford citizenship to people not of their ethnic or religious identity.

Back to the Jews. Do they really need their own state, or do they just want it very, very badly? I’ll confess that for many years, I thought that creating the state of Israel was simply a mistake. Jews were doing fine elsewhere; we’d learned our lesson from the Holocaust. I don’t think that any more, mostly because I’ve done a lot of reading. As millions of Europe’s WW II refugees were slowly being sent to new homes in the aftermath of the war, the Jews who’d survived the various concentration camps remained in refugee camps. No one wanted them. Let me repeat that: No one wanted the Jews. 

During the war, Arabs had pressured Germany to not send Jews to Palestine leading some to blame Arabs for the final solution. I’m content to let Hitler shoulder the blame for the final solution, but the fact is that the Arabs pressured Germany during the war and Britain both before and after the war to not send Jews to Palestine. So Jewish emigration was limited before the war, and Jews were kept in refugee camps after the war until the newly created state of Israel could begin accepting them. When Israel’s enemies failed to extinguish the new state, they and other Muslim countries began expelling Jewish residents with ancient ties to their regions. Hundreds of thousands made Israel their new home.

I would love to think that Jews would be safe anywhere in the world, that a safe haven for Jews is unnecessary. But Jew hatred has a long, long history, and the numbers are not comforting. 15 million Jews in a world of 8 billion people with anti-Israel sentiment and antisemitism on the rise? Less than 0.2% of the world’s population in a sea of hostility? 

Jews, along with other minorities, are considered dhimmi in Muslim majority countries. Essentially, they are second class citizens. Perhaps the Jihadis who want to erase Israel from the map should consider the option of welcoming Jews as equals in their various existing countries. Muslim politicians in the US talk about a democratic Palestine in which all people are equal, but no one has created such a state anywhere Muslims are the majority. I don’t see how anything less than a 180º turnaround in their attitudes obviates the need for a Jewish state. 

Sadly, the history of Jew hatred is such that I don’t see it retreating anytime soon. It’s just too easy to blame a scapegoat rather than work through challenging issues, and scapegoating Jews has such an extensive history that I only see it continuing for the foreseeable future. I’m more pessimistic than most Jews who speak publicly about this. Am I wrong, or are they naive? Unless the Jews of Israel tear themselves apart, something I hope not to see, my current sense is that the Jewish state is essential far into the future. I would love to see attitudes of people in my community change. I would love to see Muslim attitudes change. I’d love to see people acknowledge the ways Israel’s enemies have stood in the way of a two state solution, the only solution that could help heal the region. 

I’m now old enough to know that this enduring conflict is unlikely to be resolved in my lifetime. I realize that this and other conflicts that worry me will continue long after I’m around. Only recently do I think about this. Is it comforting to think that I can offload this worry onto the shoulders of younger souls? Hmmm. 

Don’t Believe Ridiculous Ideas

“Did you get your coffee at the espresso cafe next door?” I asked my hair stylist. Seemed like an innocent question, but she leaned down and whispered that she got her drink at Starbucks. “Is that a bad thing?” I asked? “Well, you know, Israel,” she replied. 

Now I was confused. What did Starbucks have to do with Israel? Do they have cafes in Israel? I know they have cafes in Saudi Arabia, and I suspect they have cafes in other Arab countries, though perhaps not Yemen. Perhaps they source something from Israel, though what would that be? 

Well, in any event, my hairdresser fits in well in Olympia. “Free Palestine” signs are everywhere. Every other woke cause is represented as well. I could switch hairdressers, but how far would I have to drive to find one who’d be even neutral on Israel? Maybe if the price of gas comes down? 

So mostly I keep my mouth shut unless there’s a chance of a real conversation, which usually there isn’t. But I do search for opportunities for genuine conversation. Which led me to our Senior Center. It’s just two blocks away and has a conversation group once a week. The group’s leader has a set routine: first, the word of the day, its history, its evolution; then, what’s happened on this date in history; and then current issues. 

Most of the current issues lately are Trump-related, and there’s a lot of grumbling. Today, we talked about the recent chemical spill at a Longview pulp and paper mill in which 11 people died. One member of our group had worked there during summers when he was in college. As bad as the incident was, it was an implosion of a tank instead of an explosion, which could have been much worse. It’s horrible to say that an event in which eleven people died could have been worse, but the environmental impact could have been much worse. In any event, no one had anything cheerful to say about that bit of news.

Discussion then turned to the war in Iran, which led to Hezbollah, which led to Israel. Turns out there’s another weekly event at the Senior Center, a history class that some attend. I haven’t attended that because it’s hard for me to do one regular activity a week, much less two. In any event, I won’t be going to the history class because in the discussion of Iran, Hezbollah, and Israel, people who do attend the history class claimed that Israel’s treatment of Palestinians is analogous to American history with Indians. Israelis are settler-colonialists, they starve the Palestinians, they bomb hospitals, and yes, if the New York Times says that Israelis train dogs to rape Palestinian prisoners, then it must be true. Genocide? True. Apartheid? True. Even Jews say all the bad things are true. So, it must all be true?

Jews are free to disagree with each other. Are Palestinians free to disagree with each other? No. They will get killed for saying things comparable to what Israelis say about their country. So the fact that some Jews say one thing and some say another proves nothing to me. Listen to all sides, please, before you take up arms.

Sorry, (not sorry) but I’m finished with that group. One new person said she taught Middle-East history at Baylor, so she knows what she’s talking about. Yeah, and every woke professor knows the truth about everything. So, no, I really don’t need to hear any more from these folks about Israel. 

If you have any room in your head for another point of view, consider reading this recent article from Quillette (Quillette has saved my sanity since it’s first appearance online with thoughtful journalism.) You can subscribe for free, but pay for a subscription if you can.

Anti-Zionism as Redemptive Racism by Shalom Lappin

Who’s to Blame for this Mess?

Since I live in deep, deep blue territory, everyone around me blames Republicans for the mess we’re in. The mess I’m referring to is this: we’re in the middle of a war while being led by Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth. It’s OK to scream.

The problem I want to address today is that the people who didn’t vote for Trump in 2024 simply point to those who did and blame “them.” Sorry, but it’s not that simple. Do you recall the early spring of 2024 when Democrats were unable to tell Joe Biden that he simply could not run again? I remember. I remember that in February of that year, I was screaming to my sister that this country simply had to come up with better choices than Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Well, we didn’t. Neither party had the ability to challenge entrenched leadership and demand better. So here we are.

My point is this: We did this to ourselves, so stop pointing fingers at the other guys. Do you believe that democracy is the best form of government? Then show me how we get out of this giant f**cking mess. I think we’ve proven that 250 years is all she wrote for this once-beautiful nation.

Perhaps you voted for Kamala Harris as I did. I don’t know what mess we’d be in if she had won, but I’m guessing that they wouldn’t be this particular mess that we face now. I’m not going to speculate on that. But I do think that if she had won a rigorous primary campaign, she’d have been a stronger candidate and could have won the election. Or else the Democrats would have emerged with an even better candidate who would have won.

Trump was not inevitable. We did this. Is there a fix? If so, I don’t think finger pointing is the solution. Let’s start by listening and talking and listening and talking some more. Or else it’s curtains for the US. IMHO as always. Please set me straight if you disagree.

The Arab Case for Israel

Until the start of the latest war in Iran, I didn’t know that The Foundation for Defense of Democracies existed. But since then, I’ve listened to several videos of theirs. This one is not specifically on Iran. But given that a major focus of the Islamic Republic of Iran is the destruction of the state of Israel (the little Satan as opposed to the US which is the big Satan).

Hussain Abdul Hussain, the interviewee, is the author of The Arab Case for Israel. He is one of the few Arab natives of the Middle East willing to openly support Israel, but that was not always the case. I love this interview because Hussain discusses how his views evolved as he and his family moved from one country to another and met children from many different backgrounds.

Enjoy: The Arab Case for Israel
47 min.

Three Cheers for Two States

Hoopla abounds regarding declarations from France, England, and Canada about their intents to recognize a Palestinian state “soon.” 

Each country has some qualifications embedded in their statements. Those qualifications differ, but their desire for a two state solution to the conflict between Israel and Palestine is clear. I share a desire for a two state solution, but I would not award the status of statehood to Palestinians anytime “soon.” And I doubt that any Palestinian leader would accept the offers that are on the table. Why would they turn down this opportunity? The countries behind the hoopla assume the continued existence of Israel, and that is simply unacceptable to the most vocal Palestinians. 

Palestinian statehood is not being offered in lieu of Israeli statehood. European countries that recognize or plan to recognize a Palestinian state do not have the intent of terminating the Israeli state. Had any past leaders of Palestinians been willing to accept the continued existence of the state of Israel, they could have had a state long ago, imperfect though it might have been in their eyes. 

Israel did not begin with their conception of perfection. From the time of the 1917 Balfour Declaration on, Jews have known that they would not get as much land as they wanted, nor would they get to choose lands most important to them. Rather, they knew that they would get what others offered them. Meanwhile, Palestinians opposed every proposal that included land for a Jewish state.

Over the past 40 years, many people, myself included, have considered the Israeli settlements in the West Bank to be a major obstacle to achieving a two state solution. “Just Say No” to those settlements, and peace will ensue. I’ve read or listened to legal explanations of why the settlements are legal. I’ve offered links to those arguments for those curious enough to wade through history. But I’ve also thought that it doesn’t matter if the settlements are legal, they still might not be wise. Legal and wise are not synonymous.

This year, stories of “settler violence,” I.e. settler attacks on Palestinians, have been in the news. In one story, settlers even attacked IDF soldiers who were returning from dismantling a bomb making factory in a Palestinian town in the West Bank. That was shocking, not just to me, but to many in Israel. Other incidents of settler violence have appeared in western media. But I don’t trust accounts in most western media regarding anything happening in the middle east. 

Then today, I stumbled across a podcast called “Unpacking Israeli History” that focuses specifically on the issue of settlements and recent stories of settler violence. I’ve listened to other episodes of “Unpacking…” but this is an especially good one. I can’t construct an adequate summary of the whole West Bank settler issue, so I’m suggesting that you find time to listen to it yourself. Especially listen to it if you, like me, have long felt that the settlements are an ongoing impediment to a two state solution. 

The protracted war in Gaza is horrible. But releasing Israeli hostages might go a long way to ending the war, and it’s frustrating to hear all of the Hamas slogans – “From the river to the sea,” “Globalize the Intifada” – etc. and not “Free the hostages!” How did this get so one-sided? And how is it that the press that promotes the Hamas version of events can continue to neglect to mention that the goal of Hamas is the extinction of Israel. Is that detail not important? 

I would like to see peace between Israel and the Palestinians before I die. As I am now in my 80s, and nothing resembling peace is on the horizon, I’m not optimistic. Since October 7, 2023, I’ve been paying a lot more attention to this part of the world. One thing I’ve noticed is that Jews, both  Israelis and those in the diaspora, are open about their disagreements about Israel, whereas Palestinians seem only to speak the party line. It makes a difference if you believe that you put your life in danger by disagreeing with that party line. Jews, on the other hand, are raised to argue over everything. This stark cultural difference is a big factor in my support of information about the war that comes from Israeli sources. I’m confident that if it is not accurate, a truer version will be out shortly. It is shocking to me that so many colleges are scenes of students and faculty uncritically spouting Hamas’ propaganda. Is thinking not allowed on campus anymore?

Well, this rhetoric about a Palestinian state is unlikely to bear fruit, IMHO. But life is full of surprises, though I’m not holding my breath. Meanwhile, here’s a link to the podcast and transcript.

Settler Violence: Hard Truths with Haviv Rettig Gur