Here’s How to Vote for Judges!

One of the most perplexing things on the ballot each year is elections for judges. Candidates cannot state their positions on issues that might come before the court, e.g. parental rights, abortion, gun control, and many other things. Their races are non-partisan. So how on earth are we supposed to choose between them? Good looks? Law schools? Pictures of their families? 

In years past, I’ve asked a friend whose brother is a lawyer for advice. But that’s just his opinion based on whatever contacts and experience he has. If he doesn’t know anything, he won’t suggest anything. So sometimes I’m still left wondering what to do. This year, I’ve been clicking around to see what resources are available, and I’ve found one that might help: Ballotopedia 

Ballotopedia is not my favorite website. It’s cluttered with ads and there are two main, and confusing, side menus. But stick with it and you’ll find that there is a lot of useful information. If you’re wondering if it’s worth your time, let me remind you that five of our state’s nine Supreme Court Justice positions are up for election this year. If ever there was a year to weigh in on the court, this is it. Four positions will be on the primary ballot which you should already have. One goes straight to the general election because only two people are in that race.

Here’s an example of a race where spending time on Ballotopedia can help you sort out the candidates. Four candidates will be on the ballot for Position 5 on the Supreme Court. All four have been to law school, but that’s about all they have in common.  Click on each name and scroll under their picture to find a link to their campaign website. One, Theo Angelis, was appointed this year by our governor when a justice resigned. Check his endorsements for this “non-partisan” position. You won’t find a lot of endorsements except for Angelis, but don’t let that stop you. One stands out to me, namely Dave Larson. Stick with his website for a bit and you’ll see that he’s able to take a principled, well-reasoned stand that might make him unpopular in certain deep blue circles. That appeals to me, especially this year. 

Twenty years ago, the endorsements that pile up for certain candidates might have persuaded me to support them. But this year, after watching the changes in organizations such as the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, teacher’s unions and other labor organizations, those endorsements are as likely as not to send me to a different candidate. With five seats up for election on a nine member state Supreme Court, this would be the year to spend some time studying the candidates for each position. Ballotopedia is a good place the start.

Note: Because the Ballotopedia website is so quirky, I’m not guaranteeing this link, but please persist if it doesn’t go directly to the site. And do click around for other information while you’re there.

Washington Supreme Court Races

Who’s to Blame for this Mess?

Since I live in deep, deep blue territory, everyone around me blames Republicans for the mess we’re in. The mess I’m referring to is this: we’re in the middle of a war while being led by Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth. It’s OK to scream.

The problem I want to address today is that the people who didn’t vote for Trump in 2024 simply point to those who did and blame “them.” Sorry, but it’s not that simple. Do you recall the early spring of 2024 when Democrats were unable to tell Joe Biden that he simply could not run again? I remember. I remember that in February of that year, I was screaming to my sister that this country simply had to come up with better choices than Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Well, we didn’t. Neither party had the ability to challenge entrenched leadership and demand better. So here we are.

My point is this: We did this to ourselves, so stop pointing fingers at the other guys. Do you believe that democracy is the best form of government? Then show me how we get out of this giant f**cking mess. I think we’ve proven that 250 years is all she wrote for this once-beautiful nation.

Perhaps you voted for Kamala Harris as I did. I don’t know what mess we’d be in if she had won, but I’m guessing that they wouldn’t be this particular mess that we face now. I’m not going to speculate on that. But I do think that if she had won a rigorous primary campaign, she’d have been a stronger candidate and could have won the election. Or else the Democrats would have emerged with an even better candidate who would have won.

Trump was not inevitable. We did this. Is there a fix? If so, I don’t think finger pointing is the solution. Let’s start by listening and talking and listening and talking some more. Or else it’s curtains for the US. IMHO as always. Please set me straight if you disagree.

Jeffrey Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein

Wait, what? I’m supposed to forget about Jeffrey Epstein and start thinking about locking up Barack Obama? That’s how Trump is going to dodge the news about his close ties to a creepy pedophile? Well, Donald, it’s not working with me.

Whatever you and I might think about Barack Obama’s policies, and there is room for disagreement about some of them, I just don’t think even Donalds’ incompetent batch of legal advisers can find reason to lock up Obama. If I were The Donald, I wouldn’t invite any sort of comparison to Obama. Just my humble opinion.

The World We Knew Is Gone

Yesterday, an installer came to replace a malfunctioning remote for our gas fireplace. He’s been here three times before, so I’ve come to appreciate his skill and personality. He’s self-employed and both professional and personable. We don’t chat much, but we’ve had pleasant exchanges. When he finished up for what I hope is the final time, I bravely asked him if he was “political.” He said he wasn’t actively political, but “had his beliefs.”

I took that to mean that he pays some attention to what going on in the world without it dominating his life. So, what did he think of the new administration, was he supportive? His thoughts: it will be disruptive, but the disruptions are for the best. Tariffs will work out for the best. We will end up in a better place. The government is bloated; we need to take care of our own people before sending money overseas.

I don’t have strong opinions about bloat and inefficiency in the government. Yes, there’s likely some amount of bloat, but I don’t expect government to be as efficient as a business. A business can decide not to serve some people when it is too expensive to do so. Think rural broadband, for example, Without subsidies of some sort, no cable company is going to extend their services to scattered homes on remote pieces of land. That’s a money losing proposition. But rural broadband has become as essential as rural electricity, so what are we to do? Government subsidies of one sort or another. Is that bloat? Hmm.

But what about “taking care of our own people before helping people abroad?” My installer suggested helping homeless people first. OK, but I’ve never heard a word of support for homeless people coming from this administration. Will our leaner, meaner government fund more housing programs for low income people? More services for people addicted to drugs or alcohol, more services for people with serious mental illnesses? I’m not seeing plans to shift money from other programs to these services.

I asked about Ukraine. For sure my thoughtful, gentle installer would not spend a dime on Ukraine. He sounded much like JD Vance at his worst, but in a gentle voice. “We don’t owe the Ukrainians anything.” On this point, I think he’s just uninformed. Yes, I think we do owe Ukrainians a lot. Putin is a thug. The US, for all its faults, has the ability to keep thugs like Putin in check. We have a horrid track record with thugs, but this is one we could contain if we choose to do so. Biden constrained Ukraine so much that Trump now says Ukraine cannot win this war and must be “brought to heel.”

I will trust you, dear readers, to know that Trump envies Putin and despises Zelensky. Without rehashing that history, let’s just say that I support Zelensky and despise Putin. To see us abruptly end weapons support to Ukraine is gut wrenching. To see us terminate information sharing? This is where the world I’ve known comes to an end. Putin immediately sent rockets to slaughter civilians. Their blood is on our hands. I am ill thinking of it. I am not in position to attend protests as I once did. (Are there any?) But I write blog posts and support candidates who support Ukraine.

My view is that the chaos being wrought by Elon Musk will only bring the inability of government agencies to perform their various duties. I don’t see the light at the end of the tunnel. Saddest of all, is that I blame Democrats for going off the rails on culture war issues to the point that many people I know online could not support them last fall. Nothing is as it should be. The world is upside down, inside out, no rainbows in sight. I’m glad I’m 80 and not 40.

Chaos Reigns. Are You Game?

Here at home, we are in the midst of a wind storm with gusts up to 50+ mph, but this is nothing compared to the winds that are blowing through Washington DC!

Question: Is chaos truly the best way to improve the federal government?

Answer: I doubt it, but when Congress insists on being dysfunctional, maybe.

Opinion: We are where we are because we have elected and re-elected people to the Senate and House Of Representatives who, for the past two decades have refused to govern. Period. Continuing resolutions avoid the pain of making budget compromises. Executive Orders proliferate in the absence of laws that address issues people care about. So, don’t complain. Blame the Democrats? Sure. Blame the Republicans, Sure. Personally, I put more blame on the Republicans as far as mucking up Congress, but I put equal blame on Democrats for sticking their fingers in their ears on any and all woke policies.

Going forward: Can we? That’s a really important question because our President and his cronies will do as much as they can get away with to advance their agenda in the absence of any pushback. They will likely defy any lower court decisions that don’t go their way. Will the Supreme Court object to anything Trump does? If so, what will Trump do? The actual constitutional crisis happens when Trump defies the Supreme Court or when that court decides not to interfere with the brash actions coming from the White House. 

Is your Go Bag ready?