Stress Testing Our Democracy

With the election of Donald Trump once again in 2024, we have opted to run a stress test on American democracy. Some thought we did this in 2020 with Trump’s first election. But guardrails in human form prevented Trump from doing all of what he wanted to do. Some think that the success of those guardrails are what brought us to Trump 2.0. His supporters were able to claim that his bark is bigger than his bite, so not to worry.

Human guardrails will be largely absent from his cabinet and other positions in the executive branch this time around. Now it will be up to people in Congress to protect us from the impulsive Trump who doesn’t listen to his Presidential Daily Briefings or bother to learn about the complexities of various issues. The first opportunity for the Senate to act will be regarding Trump’s cabinet nominees. Will Senators roll over and approve people who are unfit for their positions? Or will they hold hearings, require background checks, and actually reject some who might pose a danger to the country?

Biden has faded from public view, and Trump seems to be our acting President – or acting co-President along with Elon Musk. Score one for Elon this week as Trump has come out in favor of the H1B visa program that enables tech companies to import clever people from abroad to power their various creative endeavors. The question today is what will the MAGA wing do now? Will those who are opposed to almost all immigration, most especially of brown people, begin to lose their faith in Trump? Will anything at all cause them to rethink their support?

Some people fear, while others cheer, the notion of Trump as a wrecking ball. I’ve heard the call for more efficiency on the part of federal agencies for as long as I’ve been a voter. No one really delivers. Do we need a DOGE initiative to simply eliminate a variety of agencies, perhaps whole cabinet departments such as the Department of Education? That’s not my inclination. Long ago, I decided that government agencies are not going to be efficient, but that their functions are needed, and I would just tolerate inefficiency. 

After coming to that conclusion, I was pleased when some state and county agencies seemed to do some housekeeping. For sure, employees got some sort of customer service training. Also, some employees gained the ability to help with two things at one visit! E.g., “Would you like to change your voter registration information along with the address on your driver’s license? We can do both!” Well, yes I would, and thank you very much! Are similar improvements possible on the federal level?

Perhaps. Ten years ago, when we wanted to remove a culvert on a small stream on our property, several agencies at different levels of government needed to approve this project even though removing culverts is generally a good thing. But, the various agencies had at least cooperated by creating just one set of forms that could be submitted to all, plus they had designated one person to make the final approval! Still tedious, but much less tedious than in prior years. 

I favor incrementalist approaches to change, at least as it relates to governments. Revolutions just don’t always turn out well. Consider Russia. Or Iran. Or Cuba. Sure, get rid of Assad in Syria. But if the violence of a revolution can be avoided, I think that would be a good thing. Those who support Trump acting as a wrecking ball might have fantasies of a peaceful transition to a much smaller government. My vision is one of chaos with the loss of environmental protections and the minimal safety net that exists today. 

Will the Senate and the House of Representatives develop a spine and reclaim their authority to hold hearings on Cabinet nominees. Will they actually perform any oversight of any agencies? Will courts become too political or will they mind the Constitution?

For now, I remain curious – and anxious. We shall see.

P.S.: The news of Jimmy Carter’s death has just come out as I’m finishing this piece. I’m confident that if Kamala Harris had won the election, he would have lived long enough to see her inauguration. 

Merry Christmas, Folks

Greetings from the East Puget Sound Lowlands where things are green, as usual. No lower elevation snow this year at all. Not even in the foothills. We’ve had enough wind to cause some power outages, but we have heat and lights in our house today.

If you are with friends or family today, I’m glad for you. We are reasonably healthy and together, so all is well here. I am sad for Ukraine, but I have a tiny bit of optimism that the tide there will turn this coming year. What’s the basis for that optimism? Simply that Russia is not doing well. Yes, a few gains on the battlefield, but the country is not healthy. Did you know that Russia has lost five cargo ships this month? Sunk! Kaput! Some breaking apart in rough seas, one from an explosion on board. Kaput! Again, fingers crossed for Ukraine.

As for the Middle East, I’m allowing myself a bit of optimism on that front as well. What if the guys who toppled Assad have changed for the better during the years since the active civil war? What if they really could govern with a spirit of tolerance? I’ve decided to be hopeful as a Christmas present to myself. Folly perhaps, but a spell of optimism can’t hurt, can it? Imagine what change for the better in Syria could do for Lebanon, Israel, Iraq. I’ll confess, I’m nervous for the Kurds, but fingers crossed for them as well.

I hope you are all having a joyful day.

An Interesting Ballot This Year

Gallery

I just voted in the Washington State 2024 Primary election. Mail ballot, of course (which I love, and which some people don’t, for reasons I do not understand). For the first time ever, I approached the ballot as an independent, … Continue reading

But He’s a Jew!

Gallery

Are you in a tizzy wondering if Kamala Harris will make the right pick for her VP nomination? You’ve seen the short list: Gretchen Whitmer (no, because we’re just not ready for two women on the ballot), or Andy Beshear … Continue reading