Remember Martin Luther King, Jr.?

Once upon a time, America had a leader with an inclusive vision for our future. He was not a President. Rather, as a simple citizen, Martin Luther King, Jr. campaigned for bringing black people into our society on an equal footing with the descendants of our founding fathers and the millions of people who immigrated here from Europe.

Despite the protections of our Constitution, the United States had found ways to keep black people down, de jure segregation primarily in the south, and de facto segregation everywhere else. When Jim Crow laws were exposed via videos of sit-ins, voter registration drives, and strategies such as the Memphis bus boycott, we could no longer deny the reality that we were not a nation with equal protection of our laws and equal opportunity for all. We were shamed into taking action to remedy the obvious injustices we saw on TV screens in living rooms across the country.

Slowly, we in the north accepted that policies such as red-lining accomplished the same work in the northern cities that Jim Crow laws did in the south. They kept black people out of our line of sight, “in their place,” so to speak. Yes, they could sit anywhere on our buses – as long as they agreed to exit into segregated neighborhoods, stay out of our unions, and not ask for things that would expose our complicity in their lower status. Slowly, very slowly, these policies began to change also as activists shifted from their work in the south and broadened their work to address issues nationwide.

It’s important to remember that King did not act alone. Rosa Parks did not spontaneously decide to remain in her seat. Black people had been meeting and talking and planning for many years to develop strategies to bring about change. King was an amazing leader, the key word being leader. His ability to articulate a positive future enabled white people to listen and work with him. But there were many other local leaders involved in planning the non-violent actions that elicited the brutal reactions that were impossible to ignore. By anticipating the reactions that exposed the true status of black Americans, these local leaders could plan legal strategies and support for those who were jailed and/or attacked for their actions.

Rosa Parks was a hero of mine for many years before I learned about all the planning that preceded her refusal to move to the back of the bus. I learned that another woman with a more checkered history was not supported by those planning Park’s moment of fame. The civil rights leaders decided they needed a woman who could not be criticized for any reason other than her decision to keep her seat in the front of the bus. You can agree or disagree with that position, but we often face the same consideration today as we continue the work for equal opportunity for all.

So much has been said in recent years about the unfinished work for equality. Are all disparities the result of racism? Some insist they are; others argue that equal outcomes cannot be achieved, that many factors contribute to disparities. Would MLK have favored equality of outcomes? I doubt it, and his name is not often used in current campaigns that seek to erase disparities. Still, I doubt that he would be silent if he were alive today. There is always work to be done. Biases are likely with us forever. We honor King on his birthday to remind us that we always need to be vigilant in order to keep our biases in check.

So: Happy Birthday, Dr. King, and thank you, thank you, thank you for your vision, your powerful words, and your work to bring that vision to reality.

In This House, We Believe… What Exactly?

Recently, I put up a post about the Cowboy Code of Ethics asking you all if you would accept it as it, modify it in some way, or do some completely other thing. Then I needed to look up the wording for signs I see around our neighborhood starting out with “In this house, we believe…” with a list containing phrases such as Black Lives Matter, Women’s Rights are Human Rights, No Human is Illegal, Science is Real… often ending with “Kindness is Everything.” Not exactly a code of ethics, but an interesting exercise none the less.

In the process of looking for that sign, I discovered that people with other ideas had adopted their own versions of this list. I found one that read: Biden Stole the Election; Fauci Can’t Be Trusted; Bill Gates Isn’t a Doctor; Hillary Belongs in Prison; Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself; Media is Propaganda. So, OK. That’s them. 

Then I opened a Substack post in which the author had created her own list. Here’s what Jenny Holland writes:

In this Substack, we believe

  • Tucker Carlson is the most perceptive, intelligent broadcaster today
  • Donald Trump is far less corrupt and dangerous than Joe Biden
  • Steve Bannon is just a Reagan Democrat, not the second coming of Joseph Goebbels
  • MAGA is the the 21st version of the early 20th century labour movement, not the Brown Shirts
  • Anti-vaxxers are probably right about everything
  • Conspiracy theorists should be listened to
  • Traditional Catholics are not domestic terrorists
  • Muslim parents are right to protest LGBT lessons in schools
  • January 6 was a fed-surrection
  • Giorgia Meloni is the most interesting politician in Europe and the left is angry because she sounds more left-wing than they do
  • Viktor Orban is correct about protecting traditional Christian values

I responded to this post by explaining what I agreed with and what I disagreed with. The author was kind enough to reply saying she thought I wasn’t hopeless. 

So, dear readers, what would we agree on if we were to come up with our own version of “In this house, we believe…” I will start, and probably not finish, this task expanding on my thinking on some of them. Feel free to challenge me on any of them.

In this house, we believe:

  • All lives matter.
  • Doubt is essential.
  • Fairness is fine, but don’t expect that you’ll get it.
  • Schadenfreude is acceptable once in a while.
  • Western medicine is capable of good things, but a little humility would be good for all. (I survived pneumonia as a kid with the help of penicillin; I’m alive with the help of a pacemaker today.)
  • The health of my community sometimes requires sacrifices on my part.
  • The concept of “My Truth” is BS, though “The Truth” is often elusive.
  • We all act based on our hopes and fears. Understanding other people’s hopes and fears might help heal some of our divisions. We could, at least, have better conversations.

Regarding the first of these, “all lives matter,” I honestly, truthfully, deep, deep down, believe that if we are not safe to say that all lives matter, we cannot heal our divisions. Saying this does not erase our history, but if we cannot respect each other enough to say that their life matters just as our own life matters, then we cannot get to square one in solving anything.

Regarding doubt, we obviously need to accept some things as provisionally true in order to get out of bed in the morning and do anything at all. But we should also be willing to entertain new information and change our minds when something persuasive comes along. It’s becoming really, truly hard to know what’s right and what’s wrong, but doing nothing is not an option, just as picking a side and sticking with it no matter what is also not an option. 

Western medicine, aka Big Pharma, drives me crazy with their ridiculous propensity to take advantage of patents, their ability to flood any legislative body with lobbyists, and their ability to present cherry-picked information to doctors along with steak dinners and cocktails. Is the answer public funding of all research? I doubt it. Better oversight by a more independent FDA? Perhaps. Whatever the case, we need to address this. AND other forms of coziness between physicians and services such as labs, imaging, and other equipment providers.

Public health has been targeted since Covid lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and masking school kids. But it’s essential. So many of the improvements in life expectancy over the past 200 years are due to public health efforts. We can’t allow this service to be undermined.

“My Truth:” Give me a break. Yes, your experience has shaped your thinking, but no, you do not have “Your Truth.” You have your thoughts based on your experiences. Actual truth is what we can agree on after testing it in a series of back and forth challenges. And even then, it’s provisional until somewhere down the line, new information upends our current understanding. 

My brain is now maxed out for the day. Time for you to argue with me!

All Lives Matter. Yup.

There. I’ve said it: All Lives Matter.

Some of us do not pay a lot of attention to political things, and I find that refreshing. I have to take little breaks from time to time in order to regain my sanity. Then I plunge back in and wallow in the insanity of the day again, while these friends remain calmly focused on other things.

A couple of months ago, our retirement community posted a large “Black Lives Matter” banner above a garage door (note: above the garage door of the common people and our employees, not the garage door of our more privileged people, some of whom remain oblivious to this statement of solidarity with the ongoing protests). When a dear friend of long standing first noticed this banner, the reaction was, “WTF, don’t all lives matter?”

Not wanting this friend to come across as ignorant in public, my advice was to never say those words aloud. “But why?” I did my best to explain why “All Lives Matter” is a no-no, but I couldn’t even really convince myself. I know people can’t say that, that they reveal themselves to be “deplorable” if they do. But, in the time that has transpired since then, I’ve slowly decided that we can never be at peace as a society until we can safely say out loud that All Lives Matter.

As cancel culture has evolved into a major thing over the past several years, I’ve been seeking out a variety of voices to try to find words that seem thoughtful and credible to me. I’m finding a bunch of folks worth reading and listening to. Sadly, many of them are left-leaning, but show up in conservative journals or on conservative podcasts or channels because puritanical leftists won’t publish them or invite them to speak. 

The purity police have been totally successful in shutting down any voices who claim All Lives Matter. Meanwhile Black Lives Matter protesters have become so emboldened that they now challenge people sitting at outdoor restaurants to raise their fists and join them in BLM chants. Videos of people who resist being surrounded and harassed are part of my motivation for writing this post today. 

I’m also tired of watching my city council boast of their commitment to black and brown people, their determination to fund organizations that aim to help black and brown people, and their determination to strip away funds from police who exist to help us all. 

So, again, why must all lives matter? My contention is that feelings of compassion and empathy that screen for skin color or other minority designation cannot get us anywhere we need to go. We simply don’t know the details of other people’s lives that are not visible. If the challenges of poverty are more common in some groups than others, that cannot alter the necessity of addressing poverty regardless of skin color in such a wealthy society. If unemployment affects some groups more than others, that cannot alter the necessity of addressing the impact of unemployment on any person who wants to work and cannot find a decent job. 

If lack of access to health care affects some groups more than others, we still need to address the need to remove barriers to decent health care for all Americans. I could go on, but I hope you get my point. Our concern for those who are not thriving in our society needs to be colorblind. We don’t need health care for black Americans or brown Americans or Native Americans or disabled Americans. We need health care for all Americans because health care is one element that help people thrive. Same for education. Same for employment.

Yes, of course, there are circumstances that affect certain groups and need to be addressed. We are admonished to address any factors that specifically affect black and brown people, and I have no objection to this. Yet I assert that we must do this within the context of broader colorblind programs that address all factors that keep people down.

Your thoughts might also go to policing; this summer’s protests rest on the assumption that racism is rampant in policing everywhere, that no amount of training can scrub the stain of racism from any police department anywhere, that it’s inherent to the job. I.e., no one would apply to be police officers unless these applicants bring racist assumptions with them. Therefore, social workers can take the place of most police officers. Public safety rarely requires an officer with a gun. 

You are certainly entitled to that opinion. But I’m entitled to another opinion. I believe that many police officers are people of good will, people who can, perhaps reluctantly, accept that bias affects them as it affects us all, and who want to learn how to do their jobs without disadvantaging any group of citizens. I believe it is a challenge to recruit those who are willing to learn and adapt, but that it is essential to do so. I also believe it is imperative that we stand up to people who spread the “All Cops Are Bastards” slogan (even when addressing the city council). Why aren’t council members challenging this sort of talk? 

I’m going to go further out on a limb here. Although SPD has been very successful in managing even very large protests and marches in the past, this year’s protests have been unique because they have focused so directly on police as the subject of the protest, even when our department has made huge strides under the consent decree. I can’t imagine how disheartening it must be to be attacked locally after a police action in Minneapolis! BLM succeeded immediately, nationwide, in casting aspersions on all police everywhere. And here, where we’d made real progress, there was no acknowledgement of that effort. It was simply ignored by protesters and council alike. If our police need to finesse the art of sorting out miscreants from “legitimate” protesters who chant, “ACAB!” then fine. Learn to finesse. 

But seriously, “All Cops Are Bastards!” My response is simply, All Lives Matter.